How We Review Crypto Casinos

The Verdict scorecard — six weighted criteria

A casino’s overall score is a weighted average of six criteria. The weights are identical for every operator and never change, so any rating we publish is auditable and a casino cannot pay to move it:

• Trust & Licensing — 25%. The single biggest factor. Who holds the licence and where, ownership transparency, operating history, and any pattern of unresolved player complaints or licence surrenders.
• Payout Speed — 20%. Stated withdrawal processing times, KYC and approval policy, minimum and maximum withdrawal limits, and — where a review is tested — the real time it took us to cash out.
• Bonus Value — 15%. The real value of promotions after wagering requirements, max-cashout caps, game contribution and time limits — not the headline number.
• Game Range — 15%. Breadth and quality of slots, live-dealer tables and crypto-native originals, plus the studios and providers behind them.
• Crypto Support — 15%. Which coins and networks are accepted, on-chain fees, stablecoin options, and genuinely provably-fair games.
• Support & UX — 10%. Availability and quality of customer support, clarity of terms, and how easy the site is to actually use.

What the score means

• 8.5–10 — Excellent. Strong licensing and track record, fast payouts, fair terms. A site we’d rank near the top.
• 7.0–8.4 — Good. Solid overall, with minor trade-offs worth knowing before you sign up.
• 5.5–6.9 — Mixed. Usable but with real caveats — weak licensing, slow or conditional payouts, or poor terms.
• Below 5.5 — Avoid. Serious problems: a poor payout record, predatory terms, or accountability we can’t verify.

Research-based vs “Real-money tested”

This is the most important thing to understand about our reviews. Most are research-based overviews: we score from verifiable public facts — regulator databases, the casino’s own published terms, provider lists, community-reported payout patterns and our own account walkthroughs. We do not claim to have deposited and cashed out unless we actually have.

When a reviewer has deposited real money, played and completed a withdrawal, the review carries a “Real-money tested” badge and we record the actual payout time and any friction we hit. No badge means the review is research-based — and we label it that way on the page. A badge you can’t trust is worse than no badge at all, so we keep the line strict.

Where our facts come from

We prioritise primary sources: licence registers and regulator sites, the operator’s own terms and conditions, on-chain and provider documentation, and first-hand account creation. Where we rely on community reports — for example, a recurring complaint about withdrawal holds — we say so and treat it as a signal to investigate rather than proof.

Money never moves a score

We earn affiliate commission on some casino links, and that keeps the site free. It has no influence on scores or rankings: the weights are fixed and public, the editorial team is separate from commercial relationships, and no operator can buy a rating, a “best” placement or a more favourable review. Full detail is in our affiliate disclosure and editorial policy.

Updates & corrections

Casinos change — licences move, terms are rewritten, payout performance drifts. We date our reviews, revisit them when something material changes, and correct errors promptly with a note when the change is significant. If you think we’ve got something wrong, tell us.

18+ (21+ where required). Gambling involves a real risk of loss — see responsible gambling.